Wisconsin’s Scientific Role in H5N1 Flu Research Remains Contentious

A University of Wisconsin-Madison laboratory is set to resume experiments that could build the foundation of an early warning system for flu pandemics. The research is based on altering a deadly type of the influenza virus in a way that could make it more dangerous, though, and critics say its approval lacked transparency and creates unnecessary risks.

Unleashing terror? How to catch deadly mail-order DNA

The federal government has a short list of regulated organisms. But the government’s ban focuses on the organisms themselves, rather than the genetic instructions for making them. Because the government has not published those sequences, the companies must decide for themselves whether a mail order request is potentially dangerous.

A Holistic Assessment of the Risks and Benefits of the Synthesis of Horsepox

This paper offers an analytical framework is used to assess the risks and benefits of such dual use research, and relevant components of biosecurity policy and the biodefense enterprise (including the acquisition of medical countermeasures) in the United States are discussed.

Connell of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity speaks about the future of biosecurity research, ethics

Homeland Preparedness News recently interviewed Connell about her goals for the National Institutes of Health’s National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) and her current research into Global Catastrophic Biological Risks (GCBRs).

Medical investigations: can regulation keep up with technology?

The Mexican General Health Law establishes that medical investigations and research are subject to sanitary regulation by the health authorities. The General Health Law Regulations in Health Investigation Matters establish that 'investigations involving humans' include all types of research involving pharmaceutical products, medical devices, medical processes and all other data collection relating to human health.